CIA Operative Takes Responsibility for Algerian Gas Plant Attack – Video

Mokhtar Belmokhtar — said to be the mastermind behind the terrorist attack by the Islamist al-Mulathameen (Masked) Brigade on the In Amenas Gas complex in Algeria — takes credit for the operation.

Belmokhtar was recruited and trained by the CIA in Afghanistan. He was an “Afghan Arab” recruit from North Africa and fought with the CIA and Pakistan ISI (Inter Services Intelligence) Mujahideen that would later splinter into al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Following the deadly Afghan civil war that claimed nearly a half million lives, Belmokhtar returned to Algeria in 1993 and joined the Salafist Group for Preaching and Combat (GSPC).

READ MORE HERE – http://www.blacklistednews.com/CIA_Operative_Takes_Responsibility_for_Algerian_Gas_Plant_Attack/23798/0/0/0/Y/M.html

 

U.N. Report Says U.S. Still Torturing Prisoners Under Obama’s Leadership = Lies & Broken Promises

Facebook Censors Navy Seals to Protect Obama on Benghazi-Gate

Awr Hawkins / Breitbart.com

Over the weekend, Facebook took down a message by the Special Operations Speaks PAC (SOS) which highlighted the fact that Obama denied backup to the forces being overrun in Benghazi.

The message was contained in a meme which demonstrated how Obama had relied on the SEALS when he was ready to let them get Osama bin Laden, and how he had turned around and denied them when they called for backup on Sept 11.

I spoke with Larry Ward, president of Political Media, Inc — the media company that handles SOS postings and media production. Ward was the one who personally put the Navy SEAL meme up, and the one who received the warning from Facebook and an eventual 24 hour suspension from Facebook  because Ward put the meme back up after Facebook told him to take it down.

Here’s what Ward told me: 

We created and posted this meme on Saturday after news broke that Obama had known and denied SEALS the backup they requested. 

Once the meme was up it garnered 30,000 shares, approx. 24,000 likes, and was read by hundreds of thousands of people — all within 24 hrs. On Sunday, I went into the SOS Facebook page to post something else and found a warning from Facebook that we had violated Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities with our meme. So I copied the warning, put it on the meme as as caption, and re-posted the meme to the Facebook page.

continue at Breitbart.com:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/10/30/Facebook-Censors-Navy-SEALS-To-Protect-Obama-on-Benghazi-Gate

Google co-founder: Freedom of the Net is under greatest threat ever-This Is A REAL Worry People!

The principles of openness and universal access that underpinned the creation of the internet three decades ago are under greater threat than ever, according to Google co-founder Sergey Brin.

In an interview with the Guardian, Brin warned that there were “very powerful forces that have lined up against the open internet on all sides and around the world”. “I am more worried than I have been in the past,” he said. “It’s scary.”

He said the threat to the freedom of the internet came from a combination of governments increasingly trying to control access and communication by their citizens, the entertainment industry attempting to crack down on piracy, and the rise of “restrictive” so-called walled gardens such as Facebook and Apple, which tightly controlled what software could be released on their platforms.

The 38-year-old billionaire, whose family fled antisemitism in the Soviet Union, was widely regarded as having been the driving force behind Google’s partial pullout from China in 2010 over concerns about censorship and cyber-attacks.

He said five years ago he did not believe China or any country could effectively restrict the internet for long, but he had been proven wrong. “I thought there was no way to put the genie back in the bottle, but now it seems in certain areas the genie has been put back in the bottle,” he said.

Although he said he was most concerned by the efforts of countries such as China, Saudi Arabia and Iran to censor and restrict use of the internet, he also warned that the rise of Facebook and Apple, which have their own proprietary platforms and control access to their users, risked stifling innovation and Balkanising the web.

“There’s a lot to be lost,” he said. “For example all the information in apps – that data is not crawlable by web crawlers. You can’t search it.”

Brin’s criticism of Facebook is likely to be controversial, with the social network approaching an estimated $100bn flotation. Google’s upstart rival has seen explosive growth, with more than 800 million members worldwide and one in two of all Americans with computer access signed up.

Brin said he and co-founder Larry Page would not have been able to create Google if the internet was dominated by Facebook. “You have to play by their rules, which are really restrictive,” he said. “The kind of environment that we developed Google in, the reason that we were able to develop a search engine, is the web was so open. Once you get too many rules that will stifle innovation.”

He also criticised Facebook for not making it easy for users to switch their data to other services. “Facebook has been sucking down Gmail contacts for many years,” he added.

Brin’s comments come on the first day of a week-long Guardian investigation of the intensifying battle for control of the internet that is being fought across the globe between governments, companies, military strategists, activists and hackers.

From Hollywood’s attempts to push through legislation allowing pirate websites to be shut down, to the British government’s plans to monitor social media and web use, the ethos of openness championed by the pioneers of the internet and worldwide web is being challenged on a number of fronts.

In China, which now has more internet users than any other country in the world, the government recently introduced new “real identity” rules in a bid to tame the boisterous micro-blogging scene. In Russia there are powerful calls to rein in a blogosphere that was blamed for fomenting a wave of anti-Putin protests. It has been reported that Iran is planning to introduce a sealed “national internet” from this summer.

Ricken Patel, co-founder of Avaaz, the 14 million-strong online activist network which has been providing communication equipment and training to Syrian activists, echoed Brin’s warning, saying: “We’ve seen a massive attack on the freedom of the web. Governments are realising the power of this medium to organise people and they are trying to clamp down across the world, not just in places like China and North Korea; we’re seeing bills in the United States, in Italy, all across the world.”

Read the rest of this entry »

US Secret Service agents & Military personnel hired prostitutes in Colombia – WTF!

Claims that Secret Service agents and military personnel hired prostitutes in Colombia are an embarrassment, the US military’s top officer has said.

“We let the boss down,” US Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin Dempsey told a Pentagon news conference.

Secret Service and military staff have been questioned over allegations of misconduct on the eve of President Obama’s visit for a weekend summit.

Eleven Secret Service agents have been suspended and sent home.

A senior official told the BBC that at least 10 military service members were under investigation. A Pentagon spokesman said earlier there were more individuals involved than the five originally reported.

Distraction

Gen Dempsey said the military did not know exactly what had happened in the Colombian city of Cartagena, where President Barack Obama attended the Summit of the Americas over the weekend.

“What we do know is that we distracted the issue from what was a very important regional engagement for our president,” he said.

“So we let the boss down. Because nobody is talking about what went on in Colombia other than this incident.”

“We are embarrassed,” Gen Dempsey added.

On Sunday, the US president said that he expected a “rigorous” investigation.

“If it turns out that some of the allegations that have been made in the press are confirmed, then of course I’ll be angry,” Mr Obama said.

US Southern Command said military staff had been supporting the Secret Service during the summit, staying at the same hotel as the agents.

According to Mr Little, the Secret Service and military staff in question were not directly involved in presidential security.

According to Reuters news agency, a policeman in Cartagena said at least one Secret Service agent had attempted to take a prostitute up to a hotel room without registering his guest at reception.

Gen Douglas Fraser, commander of the Southern Command, said he was “disappointed by the entire incident and that this behaviour is not in keeping with the professional standards expected of members of the United States military”.

In a statement on Saturday, the Secret Service said 11 employees had been put on administrative leave, and apologised for the distraction caused by the incident.

The 11 employees included both special agents and Uniformed Division officers, the agency’s assistant director said.

A spokesman for the US Southern Command declined to say how many military members were under investigation or what branch they were from.

Obama betrays the left, African Americans; cheers continued expansion of drug war, criminalization of plant-based medicine Learn

Source: NaturalNews.

If you happen to need even more evidence that President Obama has gutted his campaign promises and betrayed not only the left but also African Americans who enthusiastically supported his election, he has just gone public with his support for the continued war on drugs. Keeping marijuana criminalized, it seems — and keeping more African Americans in prison — is a top priority for the Obama administration.

This means Obama supports the midnight DEA raids on our citizenry; the filling of prisons with small-time pot smokers; the disproportionately punitive sentences handed down to black men and women across America who aren’t really criminals at all… they merely suffer from a chemical addiction that would more rightly be considered a medical issue.

Nearly every country in Latin America has now openly and publicize recognized that the so-called “war on drugs” is a complete and total failure. But Obama thinks it’s just great! Fill the prisons! Prosecute more blacks! Buy more guns and night vision gear for the DEA! That’s what Obama’s America stands for, it seems.

“I personally and my administration’s position is that legalization is not the answer,” Obama said just hours before the meeting of Latin American leaders at the Convention Centre in Cartagena, Colombia, for the Americas Summit (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-17716926). Meanwhile, Obama’s top Secret Service agents and military commanders were banging Colombian whores in the background, then refusing to pay them their $47 prostitution fee.  Obama had “no comment” on that particular issue.

Let’s get real about all this. Marijuana prohibition simply doesn’t work. At least not for reducing crime and drug addiction. Anyone who thinks prohibition works is completely delusional. But it does work for certain special interests. What are those special interests, anyway?

Who BENEFITS from the continued criminalization of marijuana?

If you really want to know why prohibition remains in place with marijuana, it’s simple to find out why. Just ask yourself “Who benefits?”

• The DEA. Without a drug “problem,” the DEA won’t get hundreds of millions of dollars worth of increases in operating budgets from the federal purse strings. If drugs were decriminalized, the DEA would have to be sharply downsized (which would be a great thing for liberty and safety but a terrible thing for the DEA honchos).

• Private prisons. Thanks to illegal agreements between prison operators and state governments, prisons can put prisoners to work at slave labor wages — just a few cents an hour — manufacturing goods that the corporate prison owners sell for pure profit. If you thought the Nike sweatshops in Asia were bad, go visit a prison in the USA some time and watch the slave labor taking place right here at home.

• Local police. The “drug war” is the excuse that local police departments use to receive more grant money for weapons, assault gear and now even armored assault vehicles to be used against the citizens. Without the drug war excuse, all this grant money disappears and these cops have to go back to actually serving the community instead of bashing in doors like a bunch of cocaine cowboys.

• The government drug runners! It’s now a well-known fact that the ATF, DEA and other government agencies are all heavily involved in running drugs across America. Just Google any of these terms if you want to check it out for yourself. The ATF is even engaged in money laundering through the globalist banks. This is why government crackdowns on drugs are highly selectively — drug raids are really just a way to eliminate the competition so that the biggest drug dealer of all — the government itself — can continue to rake in the maximum profits. Legalizing drugs would obviously cause street prices to collapse, sucking all the profits out of the government-run drug business.

• Local District Attorneys and prosecutors. Without the drug war to give them a juicy field of easy targets to prosecute, their careers would take a huge hit. It’s so much harder to arrest real criminals than to go after pot smokers and raw milk farmers, isn’t it? Gee, imagine the difficulty of actually fighting REAL crime for a change?

• Big Government. The entire government benefits from the continued criminalization of drugs. For starters, it establishes the outrageous precedent that government can outlaw a native plant — even a plant that has grown wild across North America for hundreds of years. This alone is an outrageous encroachment on fundamental human freedom. Beyond that, the government can always point to “drug violence” as another excuse to squash our freedoms and put in place a tyrannical police state. It’s all “for your own good,” of course. Isn’t it always?

• Big Pharma and the hospital industry. Because recreational drugs are illegal, they’re often cut with dangerous chemicals that cause liver damage and kidney damage. This results in yet more repeat business for hospitals and the drug industry. If street drugs were legalized, they would be standardized and regulated, and adulteration of those products would be extremely rare. They would be safer to use, in other words, which is exactly what the pharmaceutical industry is dead set against. They only make money when people are damaged or sick from using street drugs concocted in somebody’s trailer.

Who LOSES from the drug war? You!

So we’ve covered the beneficiaries of the drug war, but who loses from it? You do, of course: Your liberties, freedoms, tax dollars and personal safety are all threatened by the existence of the war on drugs. Decriminalizing and regulating these drugs would have an enormously positive impact on you and your life.

If drugs were decriminalized, here’s what would happen:

• Drug gangs would vanish as their source of revenues (illegal drugs at black market prices) dry up.

• Drug-related crime would sharply fall.

• State revenues would skyrocket from the regulated sale of legalized marijuana.

• The corrupt prison industry would collapse to perhaps only 25% of its current size.

• Your personal safety and security would be greatly enhanced due to the lack of drug violence, shootings, home invasions and more.

• Mexican drug gangs would lose their power base, resulting in a sharp drop in crime along the border.

• Former “criminal” pot smokers would once again become taxpaying members of the workforce, contributing to the financial upkeep of society rather than draining it as prisoners.

• The happiness index across society would sharply rise.

Even the Red Cross says decriminalize marijuana

It’s all pure economics, my friends. Cause and effect. Legalize recreational drugs and you end the violence, the crime, the prison system overload and the entire underground market for the stuff.

It’s all so obvious that even the Red Cross has called for decriminalization (http://copssaylegalize.blogspot.com/2012/03/red-cross-calls-for-drug….).

At the same time, countless members of the FBI, DEA and active-duty police organizations are also openly calling for decriminalization (http://www.leap.cc/).

The rational argument for ending prohibition is further detailed at www.Norml.org

There are no rational reasons for keeping marijuana criminalized. There are only political reasons for doing so. That’s why Obama continues to support the irrational war on drugs — because it’s a political issue.

Obama, the betrayer of the political left

Obama, of course, is a teleprompter-reading puppet of the global elite. He does what they tell him to do, and right now they’re telling him to keep pushing Drug War propaganda because it’s a highly effective way to expand the police state and keep people living in fear while denying them access to plant-based medicine.

Obama, it turns out, has betrayed the left so many times I can hardly keep count: He supports the GMO industry, he signed the NDAA which expands secret arrests and secret Gitmo-style prisons, he’s an opponent of farm and food freedom  and he has proven himself to be nothing more than a big business operative who defends the status quo while preaching “hope and change” that he never delivers.

Obama has assaulted free speech, due process , medical freedom and parental rights. In doing so, he has betrayed many of the top priorities of the very people who once put him into office.

He wants to keep marijuana criminalized because that’s what the police state fascist system of corporate control wants.

Of course, this doesn’t mean the alternatives we’re given are going to be any better. This is not some pitch for Romney, for God’s sake. That guy is just as much of a corporate sellout as Obama (and Bush before him). Elections are created to present the illusion that the People have a choice when, in reality, all they’re voting for is which color of puppet they want to see on television while we’re all being imprisoned, exploited, enslaved and oppressed by a growing fascist state.

Care to guess which candidate would have decriminalized marijuana from the get-go? His name is Ron Paul, and the ideas of freedom and liberty that he espouses are the real answer for the future of our nation. 

Twittered – Government Spying, Journalists, Robert Green & The Removal of Temporary Privileges: Writing Contest

Source: The Activist Post

This blog is written from firsthand experience and sets out to set the record straight with regard to your rights (or lack of) and the rights of Robert Green – a UK journalist jailed for 12 months for the crime of ‘planning to hand out fliers’ (Breach of the Peace).

George Carlin once said:

You have no rights, you have a set of privileges which can be taken away at any time – and a right is not a right if it can be taken away- it’s a temp. privilege

By **** he was right!

After 4 days on Twitter I lost my right to tweet . . . OK not a god given right . . . FREE SPEECH!

But then what is?

For those of you who may not be aware – Robert Green was a UK journalist who had his temp. privilege — the right to be free — removed for the crime of ‘planning to hand out fliers’ which asked for an honest independent investigation into an alleged crime.

He was jailed for 9 months for breach of the peace with an additional 3 months added for breach of bail. Sounds impossible doesn’t it?  But try factoring in that the person he believed to be guilty was a judge and former colleague of the judge that sentenced him.

Now if Robert Green had been jailed or sued for slander or something similar – I could understand that. But can explain to me then how the crime of FREE EXPRESSION and FREE SPEECH warrants a year in jail in a ‘democracy’?  I’ve exercised my temp. privilege, the right to speak about this subject, although I am no longer able to do this on Twitter as I lost my right to Tweet immediately after I sent a mainstream journalist a link re Robert Green which asked him to investigate the story for himself. One of the keywords above is immediately. How did TPTB know what I had shared the instant I had shared it? Was my Twitter account being monitored? Sounds a little paranoid, but let me set the background.

I shut down my first Twitter account months back after receiving threats and abuse for pointing the facts out about the illegal war in Libya in a letter to Parliament. My MP took the letter I sent so seriously I received a response from A Burt at the foreign office which, in his mind at least, justified:

  • the legitimacy of starting an illegal conflict over Oil and Gold
  • using Depleted Uranium in a conflict zone
  • destroying The Great Man Made River
  • killing thousands of innocents
  • destroying the homes of thousands of more in the process

Against my better judgement I set up a new Twitter account; my intention being to share information which has been beneficial to my family about alternative medicine, especially with regard to treating cancer.

My thought was that if I put the information to Gary Lineker and had him pass it on to Stillian Petrov, once they realised it was proven fact that nature has provided us with what we need to stay/get healthy for thousands of years, it could cause reverberations around the health industry and start a revolution.

In China, until recently, 1 in 10,000 women died of breast cancer each year, opposed to one in 12 in UK. Rather than answer the question, I instead asked Linker to investigate it for himself by sending him a link to Confessions of a Kamikaze Cowboy – a book by Dirk Bennedict which details how shunning conventional cancer treatment and switching to a macrobiotic diet had cured him.

I encourage you to research this for yourselves; you will find the information shared by people such as Rick Simpson, Mike Adams, David Icke, Ian Crane, etc. has been known to man for thousands of years and has been suppressed since the Rockefellers took over the oil and medicine industries.

I am delighted to say that information shared by David Icke, Ian Crane etc. has been very beneficial with regard to the health of one of my family members.

As a result, I felt compelled to share it, having achieved my original goal and having made some new friends in the process. I then looked to share other information and perhaps have some interesting questions answered.

Was the threat of War with Iran what drove oil prices through the roof and benefited those who had speculated on oil futures back in October (see Gordon Duff’s article ‘Something fishy in the Gulf’)

My opinion is that although some experts will say that War with Iran is inevitable in order to impose a Rothschild-controlled central bank, having seen the Iranian president you will find that he makes the sign of baphomet and greets US presenters with Masonic handshakes – this, in my mind at least, signals to the occult world that he is already a puppet doing his masters’ bidding.

The real War is the financial War – yes, the day will most likely come when they bomb Iran to the ground, then rebuild it – but not until they have milked every cent out of oil futures first.

Another thing I shared with a journalist on Twitter was a question: Were details of Whitney Houston’s conversion to Islam removed from the English version of the Web? Before her death this was all over the Web… Now I can only find it in the Italian mainstream media http://www.ilmessaggero.it/articolo.php?id=180647#

Okay, four busy days on Twitter.  What lead up to my removal was explaining the original Carlin quote to a journalist, equating it to two ‘News’ stories from this week:

  • The UK government saying that they would re-address their plans with regard to a NEW privacy law due to public outcry.
  • The SKY News hacking scandal.

If a journalist can get the authority to hack into your emails ‘because it may be in the public interest’ do you really think a Government agent cannot?

In reality, they have been snooping on us for years. George Carlin was right – you just have a bunch of temporary privileges which they can take away without hesitation under things such as the broadest b/s legislation ever – the anti terrorism legislation implemented as planned after 7/7 & 9/11.

Yes they have the right to access ALL of your information without your knowledge because they might have a ‘suspicion’ or they might know someone who suspects that you might know something.  I.E. they need no excuse at all.

And what happens when the Government announce a plan to do.. well what they already do.. a bunch of uniformed people say.. I’m really annoyed.. Please stop.. And the government give them the illusion of power..

To this end, I suggest that the immediate removal of my right to tweet proves that the Government clawing back on privacy plans due to uproar was only a smoke screen. An illusion to distract the public about what goes on in the real world – you know a World where our government views security as ensuring its sponsors make money from the oil and opium trade, the means of which is forcing our soldiers to kill and die for the resources raped and pillaged in blood from the world over.

As Gregg Braden said – the Earth will be here in 5000 years. Whether or not we as a race will still be on it, or whether we destroy ourselves by fighting with each other for resources, which is shared equally would easily sustain us, is up to us.

I long for a world where the people should encourage the best honest minds amongst us (Gregg Braden, Max Keiser, Stacy Herbert, Alex Jones, David Icke, Mike Adams, Richard D Hall, Ian R Crane, Al Martin, Gordon Duff, etc.) get together for the benefit of the people to discuss how the information regarding how suppressed sources of health/energy/technology should be released, thus saving millions of lives and uniting us as one race working together in order that we understand and develop it in order to benefit ourselves as a global community.

If you are an intelligence officer reading this – I imagine you signed up for the agency to do good. I ask you: ARE you doing good by backing the elite with their plan to wipe the majority of humanity off the planet whilst making as much bloodmoney as possible through human sacrifice?

Or would you be doing good by standing up for people like Robert Green who should not only be freed BUT should be respected and congratulated for having the balls to stand up for what is right?

We the people have a right to that – but we have to stand together as the PEOPLE and show our governments and the people that sponsor them that we are taking away their temporary privilege of ruling us.

The first step is to stand up as the people and ask that the good journalists and intelligence agents amongst us do what is right and FREE ROBERT GREEN

http://thetruthisnow.com/headlines/free-robert-green/
http://freerobertgreen.co.uk/ 

USA – Secret Service Agents Sued for “Viewpoint Discrimination”

 

Source: All Gov.

A federal appellate court has ruled that two Secret Service agents must face charges for violating the free speech rights of protesters by engaging in “viewpoint discrimination” during the administration of President George W. Bush.

 On October 14, 2004, Secret Service agents Tim Wood and Rob Savage were part of President Bush’s security detail when he visited the mining town of Jacksonville, Oregon. Groups of both pro- and anti-Bush demonstrators gathered outside the hotel where Bush was staying. According to court papers, relations between the two sides were non-violent and “cordial.” However, Wood and Savage then ordered state and local law enforcement officers to move the Bush critics away from the building and undergo security screening, while allowing the pro-Bush crowd to get closer and not endure the screening. The law enforcement officers used “clubs, pepperspray bullets, and violent shoving” to accomplish their task.
 
With the help of the American Civil Liberties Union, seven anti-Bush demonstrators sued the Secret Service, claiming Wood and Savage violated their First Amendment rights.
 
The agents filed a motion to have the lawsuit dismissed. But the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the motion and denied qualified immunity to Wood and Savage.
To Learn More:
Bush Protesters Can Keep Fighting Secret Service (by Tim Hull, Courthouse News Service)
Michael Moss et al. v. U.S. Secret Service (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) (pdf)

Police Shoot Pepper Balls at Oregon Demonstrators (by Matthew Rothschild, The Progressive)

Chinese Troops Reportedly Amassing Near US-Mexico Border – WTF!

Wiki Image

Source: Activist Post

If recent accounts coming from some in the alternative media are to be believed, then Operation Fast & Furious may soon give way to an even bigger story surrounding the U.S./Mexico border. Indeed, even the notorious Mexican drug cartels might find themselves taking a back seat.

This is because claims are now being made suggesting the major presence of Chinese troops stationed inside Mexico, both along the U.S. border and the port areas.

The first question, of course, is whether or not this information is accurate. If it is, the second question immediately becomes, “why?”

Unfortunately, however, all the information we have currently comes from anonymous sources who have yet to be verified in terms of their reliability.

The reports currently garnering the most attention are those coming from Steve Quayle of the Q-Files Radio Show who recently interviewed a cross-border trucker who claims to have actually seen a major Chinese military base inside Mexico.

The trucker claims he was delivering a trailer load of food to a military camp 60 miles south of Laredo, Texas. As he was entering Mexico, he says he was escorted into the country by the Mexican Federal Police to protect the truck from hijackings and robbery.

The camp itself, according to the trucker, was about 2 miles wide and 3 miles long and was staffed by Chinese soldiers complete with armored vehicles and living quarters constructed from refurbished shipping containers. As his truck was being unloaded by the soldiers, he claims he was able to count the armored vehicles parked neatly in rows. According to the trucker, there were 10,000 armored vehicles located in this facility. He also claims that there were water tanks, generators, and communications complexes.

After this report and based upon the information given by the trucker as well as the geographical knowledge available to him through other individuals, Quayle claims he enlisted his own source which he refers to as “Cross Border Eyes,” to go to the area which was the most likely location for the Chinese base. This area was determined to be in the triangle between Sabinas Hidalgo, Lampazos de Naranjos, and Arroyo Blanco.

Upon entering the area, “Cross Border Eyes” claims he immediately noticed large numbers of Mexican Federal Police in many different types of vehicles, including some that were painted “that odd green characteristic of Red Chinese vehicles.” “Cross Border Eyes” then claims that he tried numerous other entrances to the triangular region by other roads, tracks, etc. but, at each location, there were massive levels of Federal Police on patrol. He is quoted as saying, “it was like you stuck a firecracker into a red ant hole and blew it, and you know how all the red ants come up out of the hole . . .”

Quayle also reported on the same day that High Frequency communications were being broadcast on U.S. military frequencies carrying with them “heavily oriental accented operators speaking broken English in direct communications with Conus [Continental United States] Military Comm Stations . . . . . . . . the accent was not Japanese either, but Chinese.”

Alongside these reports, there are still the unsubstantiated claims (or just rumors at this point) of Chinese soldiers involved in a shooting incident with American Border Patrol agents and the Mexican army. The incident occurred on October 24, 2000 with the Mexican army making an incursion onto the American side of the border. When the Border Patrol identified themselves and told the soldiers to return to their side of the border, the soldiers opened fire on the agents.

Janice Manning, of YOWUSA, writes:

The incident, which occurred on October 24 near the Otay Mesa border-crossing southeast of San Diego, has received little attention in the mainstream media but local law enforcement circles are a buzz at reports that Mexican soldiers were not the only ones in the area. 

Several eyewitness accounts stated soldiers of Asian and Caucasian origin were also firing from Mexico on the Border Patrol agents in the unprovoked attack. 

A Border Patrol agent, speaking to the Strategic Jungle Syndicate on the condition of anonymity, stated the attack was more than Mexican soldiers firing upon what they thought might be drug dealers. ‘Everything happened so fast but I know not all of them were Mexican nationals,’ the agent said. ‘More than two of us saw what appeared to be an Asian soldier. I didn’t get a real clean look at his eyes but he certainly looked Asian to me. The bottom line here is this was planned and not some random event. The government might not want to admit that but it’s the damn truth.’

The agent also stated several Mexican nationals, attempting to cross the border illegally, also told of ‘chinos,’ a slang term in Spanish for Chinese, soldiers dressed in fatigues. ‘There were a few people in the brush trying to get into the United States and after the shooting ended, they were apprehended and being processed to return to Mexico,’ the Border Patrol agent said. 

‘Two or three of them were close enough and said they heard men speaking what they described as Chinese. They were scared and said they had seen the men before, including some white men driving military type vehicles.’

Local law enforcement officials have also confirmed the movement of unidentified military vehicles. A deputy with the San Diego County Sheriff’s office confirmed officers have encountered unknown vehicles in and near the border area. ‘We’re all law enforcement officers and we talk a lot about what we see,’ the deputy with nine years in the department said. ‘There’s been strange things going on. Even homeowners have been calling about automatic weapons fire in the canyons near Otay Mesa. I know my friends with the San Diego Police Department also hear about it. There’s something going on and most of us feel like we’re not being told everything.’

Of course, these types of reports have never been corroborated by official sources nor by any hard evidence gained from on the ground reporting. For that reason, it would advisable not to put too much stock in them as of yet.

However, considering the fact that the world seems to be quickly marching toward a third world war in which the United States and China will undoubtedly play a major role, it might also be wise not to completely ignore such information.

 

Read the rest of this entry »

USA: Thirteen Ways Government Tracks Us – This Is a REAL Worry! Only the people can stop this!!!!

So Much For America being the “Land Of The Free”  – MORE like the “Land Of The Paranoid Government”

The cost of running all these departments and systems must be ‘Mind Blowing’ – Pardon the pun!

“God Bless America” ? Nah! – “God, Please help all its people” YES!

Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.

April 09, 2012 “Information Clearing House” — Privacy is eroding fast as technology offers government increasing ways to track and spy on citizens. The Washington Post reported there are 3,984 federal, state and local organizations working on domestic counterterrorism. Most collect information on people in the US. (Source)

Here are thirteen examples of how some of the biggest government agencies and programs track people:

One. The National Security Agency (NSA) collects hundreds of millions of emails, texts and phone calls every day and has the ability to collect and sift through billions more. WIRED just reported NSA is building an immense new data center which will intercept, analyze and store even more electronic communications from satellites and cables across the nation and the world. Though NSA is not supposed to focus on US citizens, it does. (Source)

Two. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) National Security Branch Analysis Center (NSAC) has more than 1.5 billion government and private sector records about US citizens collected from commercial databases, government information, and criminal probes. (Source)

Three. The American Civil Liberties Union and the New York Times recently reported that cellphones of private individuals in the US are being tracked without warrants by state and local law enforcement all across the country. With more than 300 million cellphones in the US connected to more than 200,000 cell phone towers, cellphone tracking software can pinpoint the location of a phone and document the places the cellphone user visits over the course of a day, week, month or longer. (Source)

Four. More than 62 million people in the US have their fingerprints on file with the FBI, state and local governments. This system, called the Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS), shares information with 43 states and 5 federal agencies. This system conducts more than 168,000 checks each day. (Source)

Five. Over 126 million people have their fingerprints, photographs and biographical information accessible on the US Department of Homeland Security Automated Biometric Identification System (IDENT). This system conducts about 250,000 biometric transactions each day. The goal of this system is to provide information for national security, law enforcement, immigration, intelligence and other Homeland Security Functions. (Source)

Six. More than 110 million people have their visas and more than 90 million have their photographs entered into the US Department of State Consular Consolidated Database (CCD). This system grows by adding about 35,000 people a day. This system serves as a gateway to the Department of State Facial Recognition system, IDENT and IAFSIS. (Source)

Seven. DNA profiles on more than 10 million people are available in the FBI coordinated Combined DNA index System (CODIS) National DNA Index. (Source)

Eight. Information on more than 2 million people is kept in the Intelligence Community Security Clearance Repository, commonly known as Scattered Castles. Most of the people in this database are employees of the Department of Defense (DOD) and other intelligence agencies. (Source)

Nine. The DOD also has an automated biometric identification system (ABIS) to support military operations overseas. This database incorporates fingerprint, palm print, face and iris matching on 6 million people and is adding 20,000 more people each day. (Source)

Ten. Information on over 740,000 people is included in the Terrorist Identities Datamart Environment (TIDE) of the National Counterterrorism Center. TIDE is the US government central repository of information on international terrorist identities. The government says that less than 2 percent of the people on file are US citizens or legal permanent residents. They were just given permission to keep their non-terrorism information on US citizens for a period of five years, up from 180 days. (Source)

Eleven. Tens of thousands of people are subjects of facial recognition software. The FBI has been working with North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles and other state and local law enforcement on facial recognition software in a project called “Face Mask.” For example, the FBI has provided thousands of photos and names to the North Carolina DMV which runs those against their photos of North Carolina drivers. The Maricopa Arizona County Sheriff’s Office alone records 9,000 biometric mug shots a month. (Source)

Twelve. The FBI operates the Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative (SAR) that collects and analyzes observations or reports of suspicious activities by local law enforcement. With over 160,000 suspicious activity files, SAR stores the profiles of tens of thousands of Americans and legal residents who are not accused of any crime but who are alleged to have acted suspiciously. (Source)

Thirteen. The FBI admits it has about 3,000 GPS tracking devices on cars of unsuspecting people in the US right now, even after the US Supreme Court decision authorizing these only after a warrant for probable cause has been issued. (Source)

The Future

The technology for tracking and identifying people is exploding as is the government appetite for it.

Soon, police everywhere will be equipped with handheld devices to collect fingerprint, face, iris and even DNA information on the spot and have it instantly sent to national databases for comparison and storage.

Bloomberg News reports the newest surveillance products “can also secretly activate laptop webcams or microphones on mobile devices,” change the contents of written emails mid-transmission, and use voice recognition to scan phone networks. (Source)

The advanced technology of the war on terrorism, combined with deferential courts and legislators, have endangered both the right to privacy and the right of people to be free from government snooping and tracking. Only the people can stop this.

USA; TSA continues to expand operations outside of airports with VIPR teams – It’s Time to Speak Out & Protest!

Source: End the Lie.

Through so-called VIPR teams, meaning Visual Intermodal Protection and Response, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), a child agency of the behemoth Department of Homeland Security (DHS), continues to expand beyond the confines of airports.

The DHS is just about one of the least trustworthy government agencies we are subjected to. After all, they have been busted lying bald-faced to Congress about their activities, while the TSA has also helped cover up the danger of the so-called naked body scanners.

Indeed, recently in Alton, Illinois, yet another instance of TSA goons operating outside of their traditional jurisdiction presented itself.

This is being done under the guise of fighting terrorism, the same justification we are fed in an attempt to explain why our government can assassinate us without charge or trial, hold us in military detention indefinitely without any due process whatsoever, prevent us from exercising our right to free speech and so much more.

Of course, this is nothing new and the TSA is actually continuing to expand even further onto highways and other methods of transportation.

In this case, the TSA’s VIPR team worked with the Alton Police Department at the local Amtrak station.

As per usual, there was no actual threat, but instead this federal agency saw a chance to flex their muscles and further push the integration of federal and local law enforcement.

“We refer to these as VIPR operations; that stands for visual intermodal protection and response,” TSA spokesman Jim Fotenos told The Telegraph. “It was not in response to a specific threat.”

Fotenos added that this operation is one of thousands which is conducted by the TSA across the United States every year, making them look more like Hitler’s SA by the day.

“They have multiple benefits,” he said. “It’s a visual deterrent and has security value. We’re working with local law enforcement and developing relationships, so that if there were an incident that we had to respond to, we have those relationships in advance.”

This blending of law enforcement agencies is quite troubling for many who value the separation of these bodies and the quickly withering state’s rights.

These TSA programs are just one of many ways in which this is done. One of the most prominent is the so-called fusion centers and a similarly troubling development is the Pentagon’s 1033 program which allows local law enforcement to acquire heavy-duty military hardware.

The TSA does not give any advance warning of where these operations will be conducted, supposedly for security reasons.

Fotenos said that this is not the first time that the TSA has conducted such an operation at the Alton Amtrak station.

Indeed, he said that they conducted one just around a year ago, which is a bit surprising given that Alton’s population in 2010 was a mere 27,865 and the city is only 16.6 square miles.

This city, located on the Mississippi River around 15 miles north of St. Louis, Missouri, is hardly a target which would attract terrorist activity.

But of course, such logical assessments are never made by federal agencies in their quest to expand their presence across the nation and into every town and city, making it impossible to escape their checkpoints and grope-downs.

“We’ve done [these operations] at Amtrak stations and multimodal operations throughout Illinois,” Fotenos added.

Interestingly, he would not be specific about the actual purpose of the operation.

He simply said that it was “passenger-based at the actual station,” which is quite ambiguous, to say the least.

“A good portion of that is done through the Alton Police Department and the use of their K-9 assets,” Fotenos said.

“The TSA also has inspectors on hand. The visual deterrent is important, and also conducting security operations. Our inspectors are looking for a number of things, and the police are looking for a number of things,” he added.

The Telegraph makes a point of saying that these operations have occurred for quite a while since the tragic events of September 11, 2001.

Of course, they are attempting to link these types of operations to the alleged Saudi hijackers who took control of planes and somehow managed to fly out-of-the-way routes for an extended period of time without being intercepted, after which they crashed into buildings.

In reality, the official story is nothing short of farcical, as James Corbett so aptly makes clear in the video below. In order to understand how many holes there are in the official story, you might also want to take a glance at this 9/11 timeline.

Suffice to say, the TSA operating in train stations in a small Illinois town in coordination with Amtrak has absolutely nothing to do with what actually occurred on September 11, 2001.

Also worth noting is the fact that terrorism actually poses a ludicrously miniscule threat to the people of the United States, yet the government continues to pretend that it is some monolithic threat.

My readers are probably well aware of this by now, as well as how this is being used to justify the American police state and Big Brother technologies while constantly stripping away our most essential civil liberties.

Fotenos also revealed how these operations being conducted by the TSA are being done, in part, to acclimate the American people to these types of operations which would fit much better into a society like Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia. He also emphasized how the private sector has become one of the tyrannical federal government’s best tools.

“Amtrak has always been a great partner, and so has local law enforcement,” Fotenos said. “Many passengers, especially those who ride the rails a lot, are more accustomed to seeing our folks and the local law enforcement there.”

If the American people don’t start speaking out about the increasingly troubling activities of the TSA and other government agencies, we can expect to see these types of operations continue and increase in frequency as even more of our rights are stripped away.

Do your part by informing your friends, family and acquaintances about how terrorism is not a threat, but is instead an invention used to justify ludicrous attacks on our liberties.

Only by making more Americans aware of this reality can we begin to push back against the waves of disinformation constantly pumped out by the establishment media and our government.

FBI memo: agents can “bend or suspend the law and impinge upon the freedoms of others” – This is a REAL Worry!

So Much for the USA being the “Land Of The Free” !

God doesn’t need to bless America anymore – He (or She) , NEEDS TO SAVE IT from it’s own Government!

WHAT A SAD DISGRACE!

Source: Activist Post

It has now emerged that the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) formally taught their agents that they were able to “bend or suspend the law and impinge upon the freedoms of others” in their quest to find alleged terrorists and criminals.

It gets even worse when we read that they claim they have “the ability to gather information on individuals which would normally be protected under the US Constitution through the use of FISA, Title 3 monitoring, NSL reports, etc.”

While the FBI’s extrajudicial assaults on the freedoms of Americans is nothing new, along with the federal government’s insane expansion of authority into unthinkable realms including the power to assassinate Americans at will, these discoveries are especially troubling.

According to Wired’s Danger Room, the FBI claims they simply didn’t mean it and since have removed the offending document from their counterterrorism training curriculum, characterizing it as an “imprecise” instruction.

This explanation is hardly surprising given that the Department of Defense made similar claims after it emerged that their training materials explicitly classified protesting as an act of “low-level terrorism.”

“Dismissing this statement as ‘imprecise’ is a rather unsatisfying response given the very precise lines Congress and the courts have repeatedly drawn between what is and is not permissible, even in counterterrorism cases, over the past decade,” Steve Vladeck, a national-security law professor at American University, said to Danger Room.

“It might technically be true that the FBI has certain authorities when conducting counterterrorism investigations that the Constitution otherwise forbids, but that’s good only so far as it goes,” he added.

However, I think that the lines drawn by Congress have been woefully incomplete, especially given the fact that it is unusual for one of our so-called representatives to actually stand up for our rights against an increasingly infringing federal government.

Even when they do, their efforts far too often fall short of the mark, as evidenced by Representative Landry’s attempt to amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 to protect Americans from indefinite detention.

As evidence of the fact that they really do not care about these “imprecise” instructions, the FBI has not taken a single disciplinary action against any instructor involved.

Furthermore, they did not even say that the agents who had been exposed to such ludicrous training materials would undergo re-training. This intensive six-month-long review of counterterrorism training materials conducted by the FBI did not even result in a review of any and all intelligence reports which would have been influenced by the “imprecise” training materials.

“This is not an effective way to protect the United States,” Senator Richard Durbin, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee overseeing the FBI, told Danger Room about the inappropriate FBI counterterrorism training.

“It’s stunning that these things could be said to members of our FBI in training. It will not make them more effective in their work and won’t make America safer.”

A letter send by Senator Durbin to Robert Mueller, the Director of the FBI, showed images from one of the FBI’s instructional materials which stated, “Under certain circumstances, the FBI has the ability to bend or suspend the law to impinge on the freedom of others.”

“Time and time again when that is done, it has not made us safer,” Senator Durbin added.

Some of the training materials aren’t so much disturbing as they are somewhat hilarious, like the “Establishing relationships” slide which tells agents: “Never attempt to shake hands with an Asian” and” “Never stare at an Asian.”

On another slide entitled “Control and Temper,” agents are told that the “Western Mind” (whatever that is) is “even keel” with “outbursts exceptional.”

However, when one is in the Arab World, agents are told that “Outbursts and lose [sic] of control expected” and “What’s wrong with frequent Jekyll and Hyde temper tantrums?”

Not only does this make little sense and expose the clear prejudice and ignorance amongst the FBI’s instructors, it also shows the naked cultural bias that has legitimized far too many illegitimate practices.

Indeed, the FBI simply manufactures terrorism in order to further strip us of our rights and hold on to their ludicrous powers.

Christopher Allen, a spokesperson for the FBI did not even attempt to dispute the authenticity of the documents, although he refused to share the full documents.

Allen also claimed that he was “unable to provide” any additional information as to their context, or even an estimate of how many FBI agents may have been exposed to the faulty materials.

In an attempt to lessen the impact of these materials, Allen claimed that “less than one percent contained factually inaccurate or imprecise information or used stereotypes.”

Allen’s claims aren’t helped by the fact that the FBI has previously taught their agents that all so-called “mainstream” Muslims are violent (which is a wholly ludicrous assertion), that Islam made Muslims want to carry out “genocide,” nor the overall glaring anti-Muslim bias present in agencies like the FBI.
The FBI’s claim that they can bend or suspend the law “under certain circumstances” include circumstances which are a bit confusing, to say the least.

“Title 3 monitoring” is typical law enforcement surveillance which requires a judge’s approval, while the issuance of National Security Letters (subpoenas for records which are issued by the FBI itself, and not judges) is, quite unfortunately, completely legal. imilarly, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is a legal way for agencies like the FBI to spy on Americans.

“This certainly does not read as if a lawyer wrote it,” Robert Chesney, a national-security expert at the University of Texas’ law school told Danger Room.

“Congress has given the FBI the authority to wiretap, collect business records, and gather other forms of information for intelligence purposes, subject to certain safeguards. It is a severe misstatement to refer to the exercise of these lawful authorities as ‘bending’ or ‘suspending’ the law; that mischaracterization runs the risk of both delegitimizing these lawful tools and, simultaneously, conveying to agents the mistaken impression that there might be some more general power to disobey the law during intelligence investigations,” he added.

While I think it is quite sad that the FBI has these authorities to begin with, it makes little sense for the FBI to teach their agents that they can bend or suspend the law unless, as Chesney points out it is done to give the “impression that there might be some more general power to disobey the law during intelligence investigations.”

Indeed, it seems quite obvious to me that this is the entire point. They want law enforcement to believe that they are above the law, which in many cases they are as they have been allowed to get away with murdering and brutally assaulting the elderly.

While the FBI has allegedly removed this offending document from their curriculum, it does nothing to help the fact that unknown numbers of agents have already been exposed to the material and actually believe it to be accurate.

Furthermore, the fact that the FBI has taken no steps to rectify the situation by retraining their agents tells quite a bit about where their priorities are.

Obama Quietly Signs Executive Order For The Mobilization and Seizure Of All American Resources Towards “Emergencies”, Preparations For Full Scale War

On Friday, President Obama signed an Executive order triggering provisions and posturing for the government seizure of any and all private property necessary (including food) for the war effort.

The foundations for all of this were laid in many Executive Orders drafted in the 1980s under Ronald Reagan, shortly after the U.S.
government became officially aware of Peak Oil.

Folks stuff like this doesn’t get signed unless you are preparing for an imminent disaster or large scale war. With the arrival of the U.S.S. Enterprise on its “final” voyage” and its carrier group, that brings the number of carrier groups in the Persian Gulf to THREE CARRIER GROUPS. The Enterprise, Carl Vincent and Abraham Lincoln. Accompanying these groups are major logistical and supply vessels that number far higher than normally in a fleet. “Gulf Of Tonkin” incident anyone?

This isn’t sabre rattling. For the past year we have seen unprecedented security measure being put in place with broad central state and police powers and bypassing of the U.S. Constitution despite the demise of Kim Jong Il, Osama Bin Laden, Moamar Ghaddaffi and rejections of Islamist Rule. We are moving towards a state of war unseen since the second world war

Hate of Obama fuels 755% growth in extremist groups; Study (Another example of the USA becoming a basket case?)

Source: The Raw Story

Fears that the nation’s first black president will be re-elected has fueled the dramatic growth extremists groups in the U.S. over the past year, according to a report from a civil rights organization that tracks these groups.

The number of groups in the anti-government “Patriot” movement have sky rocketed 755 percent since President Barack Obama has been elected, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) yearly report found.

“These groups are becoming more and more aware as they watch the primary season unfold that Obama is fairly likely to win and some of them are having meltdowns over this,” Southern Poverty Law Center senior fellow Mark Potok told Raw Story. “They’re looking at four more years under a very hated black president — hated by them. So, we’re seeing signs of real anger over that. People saying we’re at war already, saying go out and buy AK-47s and hollow-point bullets, get tools to derail trains.”

Unlike traditional hate groups, “Patriot” groups subscribe to a set of conspiracy theories and see the government as their primary enemy.

“Basically what ‘Patriot’ groups think is that the federal government is an evil cabal in the hands of bad people,” Potok explained. “The government is about to impose martial law on the country, very probably with the help of foreign troops, perhaps U.N. troops. They intend to confiscate all guns from Americans. Those liberty-loving Americans who resisted will be thrown into concentration camps that have secretly constructed by FEMA. And ultimately the government will force us all into a socialistic kind of one-world government, the so-called New World Order.”

In addition to the staggering growth of groups in the “Patriot” movement, hate groups in general have grown from 926 in 2008 to 1018 last year. Anti-LGBT groups have grown by 27 percent and anti-Muslim groups have triple from 10 to 30 in just one year.

Ku Klux Klan groups actually fell from 221 to 152 last year, largely because the second largest Klan group — the Brotherhood of Klans in Ohio — folded after its leader, Jeremy Parker, joined a faction of the Aryan Nations.

Overall, Potok said that it was the disturbing growth by ‘Patriot’ groups that shocked the Southern Poverty Law Center.

“We were all astounded by the numbers this year,” Potok told Raw Story. “We’ve seen a very, very rapid growth in the ‘Patriot’ movement in the prior two years. We all expected that just had to tail off, that this kind of growth couldn’t continue for another year. But the reality is that we saw something close to 450 new groups appear on the scene last year.”

If the president is successful in his re-election bid, Potok sees no reason that the dramatic growth will not continue.

“I think if Obama is re-elected, this is very likely to get worse before it gets better,” he said. “We’re already seeing signs of anger in groups that are coming to believe that Obama will probably win the election so they’re going a bit crazy out there.”

USA;The Era of the Creepy-State is Here – Another example of US Hypocritical Politicians F**king the country!

Source:zenpundit.com

US Congress passed a law – by unanimous consent in the Senate and by a suspension of rules in the House – to permit the Federal government to arbitrarily arrest and imprison for up to ten years members of the serf class (formerly known as “American citizens”) whose presence annoys or offends specially designated members of the elite and foreign dignitaries. A list that will no doubt expand greatly in future legislation to include very “special” private citizens.

Think about that, future “Joe the Plumbers” or Cindy Sheehans, before you ask an impertinent question of your betters or wave your handmade cardboard sign. Is ten seconds of glory on your local ABC affiliate news at 5 o’clock worth that felony arrest record and federally funded anal exam?

No? Then kindly shut your mouth, sir. Learn your place.

Two nebbish Representatives, one Republican and one Democrat, distinguished only by their lack of legislative or political importance, sponsored the bill on behalf of the big boys who fast-tracked it under the radar (they learned from the SOPA debacle). Forget ideology or boasts about carrying a copy of the Constitution in the breast pocket of their suit, whether you are in an archconservative Congressional district or an ultraliberal one, almost every member of Congress voted “aye” to trash multiple amendments in the Bill of Rights.

Almost every one.

This is an accelerating trend in recent years and in particular, a bipartisan theme of the 112th Congress, which views Constitutional rights of nobodies as an anachronistic hindrance to the interests (or convenience) of their powerful and wealthy political supporters. Our elected officials and their backers increasingly share an oligarchic class interest that in important matters, trumps the Kabuki partisanship of FOXnews and MSNBC and inculcates a technocratic admiration for the “efficiency” of select police states.

It is from this demographic-cultural root of incestuous corruption that our creeping – and increasingly creepy – manifestations of authoritarianism in American life springs. The SOPA/PIPA internet censorship bills, naked scanners at airports, Stasi-like expansion of expensively wasteful TSA security theater, proposed 24/7 monitoring of every American’s online activities, migration of police powers to unaccountable private firms, replacement of elected municipal governments with “emergency managers” (favoring financiers over taxpayers), Federal agencies monitoring political critics , the Department of Justice retro-legalizing corporate racketeering, fraud, perjury and conspiracy on a national scale, plus other infringements of liberty or gross corruption that I could list, ad nauseum.

We have reached the point where we as Americans need to stop, step back from moment by moment fixation on nonsensical, “white noise” fake political issues like “contraception” ginned up to keep the partisans distracted and become seriously involved in determining the direction in which our nation is headed. Our elite are telegraphing their strong preference for a “soft dictatorship” but we still have time to check their ambitions and rein in their looting.

It is almost quaint these days to pick up Friedrich von Hayek’s classic, The Road to Serfdom and thumb through it. The libertarian antistatists of the 20th century were so focused on the clear and present dangers of totalitarianism that the idea of a weak state that endangered liberty through a mixture of corruption and regulatory capture eluded them. The Westphalian state at it’s apex was so overweening that the enemy of free societies, after foreign monsters like Hitler and Stalin, could be ambitious intellectual pygmies like Harold Laski or Tom Hayden. The state was so omnipotent that even it’s efforts at benevolence, to build a “Great Society” of the Welfare State were injurious to individual freedom because the expanse of statism crowded and weakened civil society , the market and private life. The argument gained political traction because, to varying degrees, it was true and looked prophetic when the Welfare-state began to crash economically in the 1970′s on stagflation.

Give the Welfare-state liberals and Social Democrats of the past their due though, their intentions by their own lights were benign. They wanted to make a safer, more secure, more equal, more just life through a more powerful state (whether that was a good idea or a realistic endeavor was the central political question between right and left). The current elite in comparison is so inferior in moral character and overconfident in their abilities that they may soon make us yearn for the former’s return.

What have now in our ruling class, are the builders of a Creepy-state and their intentions are not benign, except toward themselves, for as long as the looting of the American economy can last.

Unlike the Welfare-state, the Creepy-state, shot through with corruption, is not omnipotent because it is to be the servant and gendarme of the emerging oligarchy and not their master – but it is to be omniscient and omnipresent, constantly watching, monitoring, investigating, recording, interrogating, coercing, sorting, muzzling, gatekeeping and shearing the sheep on behalf of the shepherds.

Or the wolves.

The Creepy-state is not there to protect you or give you a higher standard of living or ensure justice or democracy, but to maintain a hierarchical public order from “disruption” (formerly known as “politics” or “democracy”). If the classical liberal ideal was the night watchman state, this state is the shadowy and ill-disposed watcher in the night.

The American political elite, Democrat and Republican, Conservative and Liberal, are in are largely in consensus that the government should, in regard to the American people:

Read your email
Listen to your phone calls
Track your movements on GPS
Track your online activity
Track your spending
Track your political activity
Read your medical records
Read your financial records
Scan your body
Scan your house
Scan your DNA
Keep you under video surveillance in public
Detain you at random in public places for security checks
Close off public spaces for private use
Seize private property for private use
Censor your speech
Block your access to judicial relief
Determine your educational and career path
Regulate your diet, place of residence, lifestyle and living standards (ever downwards)
Charge you with secret crimes for breaking secret regulations
Share or leak information about you at will

Is this the America we wish for our children or grandchildren? One that epitomizes the values of our Constitution or Declaration of Independence, or is it some kind of tawdry and shameful dime store fascism of a small Latin American country? Perhaps life is finally imitating fiction?

Fortunately, it is not too late. Irrevocable changes in the constitutional order have yet to be engineered. Our politicians are followers, not leaders here. They are a small and cowardly lot for the most part and will recoil in fear from this authoritarian ethos if a sufficiently large number of elected officials are thrown out of office at once. We can still roll this back – at least the most egregiously anti-American aspects – if we get sufficiently angry come November.

Self-interest is their only lodestone.

US Judges Dismissal of lawsuit against Monsanto spurs protests, blockade by food freedom advocates

(NaturalNews) After many months of hopeful anticipation, a preemptive, class-action lawsuit filed by farmers seeking protection against Monsanto’s predatory patent enforcements has been thrown out by U.S. District Court Judge Naomi Buchwald. And in response, a group of food freedom protesters stormed the front steps of Monsanto’s Washington, D.C., office on Wed., Feb. 29, and staged a demonstration where they marched with signs and blockaded the front entrance of the building.

OSGATA et al. vs. Monsanto, which was filed on behalf of organic and non-GM farmers everywhere by the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association (OSGATA), addressed an important agricultural issue about which few people are aware. In the past, when Monsanto’s genetically-modified (GM) seeds have contaminated non-GM and organic farms, the agri-giant has sued those farmers whose fields were contaminated on the grounds that they violated patent restrictions — and in some cases, Monsanto actually won these lawsuits.

Seeking to protect themselves from such ludicrous and exploitative litigation, a consortium of farmers, seed companies, and agricultural organizations filed a preemptive lawsuit to stop Monsanto from ever again targeting farmers in this rapacious manner. The suit also challenged the legitimacy of Monsanto’s seed patents in the first place, which many say are invalid because they do not meet the “usefulness” requirements under patent law.

But Judge Buchwald, who recently heard both sides of the story at a preliminary case hearing, has apparently decided to join forces with Monsanto by declaring the lawsuit to be “a transparent effort to create a controversy where none exists.” And this statement clearly indicates that Judge Buchwald has failed to acknowledge the more than 100 instances in which Monsanto has already sued farmers for “patent infringement” when its own GM seeds and seed traits have inadvertently contaminated non-GM and organic fields.

“We’re Americans. We believe in the system. But we’re disappointed in the judge,” said OSGATA president and organic seed farmer Jim Gerritsen in response to the ruling.

Adding to Gerritsen’s sentiment, Dan Ravicher, executive director of the Public Patent Foundation at Yeshiva University‘s Cordozo Law School, stated that Judge Buchwald’s “failure to address the purpose of the Declaratory Judgment Act and her characterization of binding Supreme Court precedent that supports the farmers’ standing as ‘wholly inapposite’ constitute legal error.”

OSGATA and others are already planning to appeal the decision, which they see as a complete denial of reality. Though Monsanto claimed before the court that it would never sue a farmer over a contamination issue, this has already been shown to be false, a fact of which Judge Buchwald should have been aware.

Sources for this article include:

http://www.washingtonpost.com

http://www.latimes.com

TSA ‘thugs’ forces new mom to pump milk out of her breasts in public restroom before boarding the plane

As readers already well know, the real agenda of the TSA, (new Nazi-style brownshirts) has absolutely nothing to do with airport security (TSA security is a joke) and everything to do with “prisoner training” the public. It’s all about humiliation and dehumanization. It’s about teaching the slave citizens that they are animals to be ordered around by a bunch of lawless government tyrants who only impersonate actual law enforcement officers (TSA “officers” are not sworn officers in any way, and they have no law enforcement training).

The latest example of all this involves a Hawaiian mother who recently attempted to board an airplane in Lihue, Hawaii. She was carrying a breast pump and several empty bottles to hold her breast milk later on. For those who may not know, many new moms frequently use breast pumps to fill bottles with their own natural mother’s milk which they later give to their children.

Remarkably, upon seeing these empty bottles, the TSA agent in charge lapsed into a power trip frenzy and told her that she could not carry empty bottles on the airplane!

Now the TSA targets empty bottles, too
Hold on a second. First we’re told we can’t carry FULL bottles of water or other liquids because, we’re told, those liquids could be mixed together using some totally fictitious laboratory process to make a liquid bomb. Now we’re told we can’t carry EMPTY bottles on the airplane, too? How’s that? Are we soon going to be told that empty bottles pose a threat to national security because they might contain invisible bomb materials that nobody can see?

(Where does the TSA invent all this crap, anyway? Sometimes I think they just sit in the back room and play a break-time game called “Who can come up with the zaniest rule that the intimidated travelers will follow?”)

So — get this — the woman was told by the TSA that she would have to fill the empty bottles with breast milk before she could board the plane. This is apparently the TSA’s whacked-out logic on making sure none of those dangerous “empty bottles” get on the airplane, for whatever reason.

Except there is no “breast milking station” at the airport, of course. So where did the TSA direct this woman to go pump her breast milk? You guessed it — the public restroom.

“I asked him if there was a private place I could pump and he said no, you can go in the women’s bathroom,” the woman said. “I had to stand in front of the mirrors and the sinks and pump my breast in front of every tourist that walked into that bathroom. I was embarrassed and humiliated and then angry that I was treated this way.” (http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/307441/28/TSA-asks-woman-to-prove-he…)

You may have noticed this directive was issued by a male TSA agent. I can just see the scene now, with some pot-bellied sloth-like power-tripping pervert man saying, “Go milk your breasts in the bathroom!” and thinking to himself, “Or maybe I’ll milk ‘em for ya, what do you think about that?” It’s a fact, by the way, that the TSA conducts multiple naked body scanner screenings on attractive women so that the perverts running the scanning imagery boards can get off in the back room.

Getting back to the new mom, after she pumped the plastic bottles full of breast milk, she was then allowed to board! (Gosh, I’m surprised she wasn’t then raided at gunpoint by the FDA for trafficking raw milk!)

The TSA’s total mind game security hoax
Think about all this for a minute: if she had showed up with plastic bottles full of milk and explained they were breast milk, she would have been ordered to dump them down the drain under the “no liquids allowed over 3 ounces” rule. But when the bottles were empty, she was ordered to fill them with her own breast milk. Is the TSA just jacking with everybody to invent random, stupid requirements that have no rhyme or reason?

This is yet more evidence that TSA security is all just a big mind game. There’s no actual reasoning to any of it. You’re damned if you do and damned if you don’t. The TSA can stick their hands down your pants, finger your anus, remove your colostomy bag, undress your grandma behind the curtain, feel your childrens’ genitals, and now they can even order you to go into the bathroom and pump the milk out of your mammary glands!

You are just a slave now, get it? And slaves have no rights. No privacy. No due process and no Fourth Amendment protections against illegal searches. You are a slave under a system based on the total public humiliation of women while demanding complete obedience from everyone. Merely challenging the TSA’s authority causes you to be detained (arrested) as a possible terrorist.

When will the American sheeple rise up against this runaway tyranny?
How has America become such a nation where a woman can’t even fly on an airplane without some perverted government goon ordering her to “milk” her own breasts in the restroom?

More importantly, when will the public rise up against this tyranny and call for the mass arrest of all TSA agents who must now be charged with a long list of felony crimes, including sexual harassment, child molestation, and denying people their basic civil rights.

The TSA is the rise of the new Nazi-style brownshirts in America. Hitler’s brownshirts “functioned as a paramilitary organization of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party (or Nazi Party). It played a key role in Adolf Hitler’s rise to power in the 1920s and 1930s,” writes Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung).

If their power is not checked, these lawless government thugs will soon be running highway checkpoints, harassing people on street corners, and functioning as a political paramilitary force that effectively puts troops on the streets across America — yet these TSA goons swear no oath to the U.S. Constitution, so they have no loyalty to anything other than their government paycheck.

The TSA was created precisely because the federal government needed a class of low-IQ order takers who could be counted on to intimidate the population but would not be bound to any sworn oath of allegiance to the United States Constitution.

The entire collection of TSA agents is a gang of unindicted criminal felons who must now be held accountable for their crimes against the People. If they are not, then we no longer live in a nation where the rule of law applies. Instead, we have surrendered to rule by force and intimidation.

And that’s exactly what the TSA wants.

Next Leg Of The Ponzi Revealed – Foreign Central Banks To Begin Buying US Stocks Outright Starting Today

We were speechless when we read this from Bloomberg.

 The Bank of Israel will begin today a pilot program to invest a portion of its foreign currency reserves in U.S. equities.

The investment, which in the initial phase will amount to 2 percent of the $77 billion reserves, or about $1.5 billion, will be made through UBS AG and BlackRock Inc. (BLK), Bank of Israel spokesman Yossi Saadon said in a telephone interview today. At a later stage, the investment is expected to increase to 10 percent of the reserves.

A small number of central banks have started investing part of their reserves in equities. About 9 percent of the foreign- exchange reserves of Switzerland’s central bank were invested in shares at the end of the third quarter, the Swiss bank said on its website.

The investment will be made in equity index trackers and will include between 1,500 to 2,000 shares, among them stocks like Apple Inc. (AAPL), Saadon said.

More from Globes:

 The Bank of Israel today began investing a small part of its $77 billion in foreign currency reserves in US stocks. The central bank’s latest Markets Division report states that the new Bank of Israel Law (5770-2010) allows the Bank of Israel to make equity investments, and that it began to do so today.

The Bank of Israel will invest $1-1.5 billion in US stocks, 2% of its portfolio. The report adds that the Bank of Israel has been investing in public bodies in developed countries since 2010.

The Bank of Israel said that the investments in US stocks would be made through UBS AG (NYSE; SWX: UBS) and BlackRock Inc. (NYSE: BLK) The Bank of Israel’s Markets Division, which specializes in bond investments, will not be handling the equity investments. It added that the traders will have very limited discretion, and that they may only quote leading indices, in order to reduce the risk.

“We have almost no exposure to countries with big problems. We constantly examine where we invest the foreign currency reserves, and I can promise you that you can relax,” Governor of the Bank of Israel Prof. Stanley Fischer said at a closed conference in mid-January.

“The Bank of Israel does not disclose the currency composition of its portfolio, especially not the composition of its equity portfolio,” says the Bank of Israel. At the January conference, Fischer said, “Imagine if we were to begin publishing where you invest, so when you stop buying the bonds of a particular country, and this is published, we’ll get complaints. That is why we do not publish.” He added, “We have an external committee that conducts the examinations. You can assume that we’re aware to the fact that there are problems in certain countries.”

In other words, while the Fed’s charter forbids it from buying US equities outright, it certainly can promise that it will bail out such bosom friends as the Bank of Israel, the Swiss National Bank, and soon everyone else, if and when their investment in Apple should sour.

Luckily, this means that the exponential phase in risk is approaching as everyone will now scramble to frontrun central bank purchases no longer in bonds, but in stocks outright, leading to epic surges in everything risk related, then collapse and force the Fed to print tens of trillions to bail everyone out all over again, rinse repeat, until this chart becomes asymptotic. We say luckily, because it means that the long overdue systemic reset is finally approaching.

‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm

Source: http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com

Food Rights, Gene Rights and Monsanto

As courts and bureaucrats continue to assert that citizens have no fundamental right to produce and consume the foods of their choice, we find Monsanto lurking nearby. The Wisconsin judge who recently ruled that we have no right to own a cow or drink its milk resigned to join one of Monsanto’s law firms.

Former judge Patrick J. Fiedler now works for Axley Brynelson, LLP, which defended Monsanto against a patent infringement case filed by Australian firm, Genetic Technologies, Ltd. (GTL) in early 2010.

GTL had sued several biotechnology firms, a medical lab and a crime lab that had used its patented methods for analyzing DNA sequences. Though a federal case, the district court which heard the matter sits in Dane County, Wisconsin, where Fiedler coincidentally served as a state judge.

In that case, the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) “upheld Genetic Technologies Ltd.’s patent for noncoding DNA technologies, giving more firepower to the Australian company’s patent infringement suit against Monsanto Inc., Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. and a slew of rival laboratories,” reports Law360.

In another link, Myriad Genetics, which holds the exclusive U.S. patent on human genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, granted the license to GTL in 2002. These human genes are associated with breast and ovarian cancer.

In 2009, the ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation (PubPat) sued the PTO, Myriad Genetics, and principals at the University of Utah Research Foundation, charging that patents on genes are unconstitutional and invalid. The suit also charges that such patents stifle diagnostic testing and research that could lead to cures and that they limit women’s options regarding their medical care.

In an absurd ruling this year, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals allowed the patent on these human genes, even though the DNA sequence occurs in nature. The court decided that simply because researchers had been able to extract it, the firm owns it. Of course, under this thinking, all of nature can be patented if human technology allows extraction.

“The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has granted thousands of patents on human genes – in fact, about 20 percent of our genes are patented,” said the ACLU. “A gene patent holder has the right to prevent anyone from studying, testing or even looking at a gene. As a result, scientific research and genetic testing has been delayed, limited or even shut down due to concerns about gene patents.”

 

Read the rest of this entry »

FBI organizes almost all terror plots in the US – WTF!……

Source: RT.com

The Federal Bureau of Investigation employs upwards of 15,000 undercover agents today, ten times what they had on the roster back in 1975.

If you think that’s a few spies too many — spies earning as much as $100,000 per assignment — one doesn’t have to go too deep into their track record to see their accomplishments. Those agents are responsible for an overwhelming amount of terrorist stings that have stopped major domestic catastrophes in the vein of 9/11 from happening on American soil.

Another thing those agents are responsible for, however, is plotting those very schemes.

The FBI has in recent years used trained informants not just to snitch on suspected terrorists, but to set them up from the get-go. A recent report put together by Mother Jones and the Investigative Reporting Program at the University of California-Berkley analyses some striking statistics about the role of FBI informants in terrorism cases that the Bureau has targeted in the decade since the September 11 attacks.

The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully materialize.

Additionally, one former high-level FBI officials speaking to Mother Jones says that, for every informant officially employed by the bureau, up to three unofficial agents are working undercover.

The FBI has used those informants to set-up and thus shut-down several of the more high profile would-be attacks in recent years. The report reveals that the Washington DC Metro bombing plot, the New York City subway plot, the attempt to blow up Chicago’s Sears Tower and dozens more were all orchestrated by FBI agents. In fact, reads the report, only three of the more well-known terror plots of the last decade weren’t orchestrated by FBI-involved agents.

Read the rest of this entry »

6 Reasons Obama’s Clean Energy Policy Is Dirty and Corrupt

Source: Activist Post
High gasoline prices are increasing Obama’s unpopularity. His energy plan will make him lose even more favor because it is detrimental to the environment and the economy.

Oil is the primary source of energy for transportation and the US imports 2.7 billion barrels a year. One of the reasons why gas prices are so high is because the US is exporting more fuel than it is importing — the fuel is sold to the highest foreign bidder. Last year, the US exported 848 million barrels of fuel while importing only 750 barrels.

The primary sources of US electricity are coal (45%), natural gas (23%), nuclear (20%), hydro power dams (7%) and renewable energy (2%). US electricity prices have risen 23% over the last 5 years.

Federal energy subsidies have increased from $17.9 billion to $37.2 billion due to Obama’s stimulus. Renewable subsidies have inflated by 186%.

Here is a short list of why Obama’s energy policy is offensive:

  1. Obama shuns drilling for oil on federal land in favor of drilling in the Gulf of Mexico (remember the BP oil disaster?) and opening up the Arctic Ocean for exploration.
  2. Obama has called for $36 billion in new nuclear power loan guarantees in his push to build more plants. He considers nuke energy to be clean because it has limited carbon emissions. But what about Fukushima? And the 75% of US reactors that are leaking radiation? People should be more concerned with radioactive emissions than harmless carbon dioxide.
  3. Obama contends that algae can replace 17% of imported oil – sometimes you just have to wonder if he’s smoking crack. It will take 350 gallons of water to produce each gallon of algae oil that will guzzle farm irrigation water reserves.
  4. Obama wants to increase natural gas supplies. Natural gas is most commonly extracted through fracking and the secret chemicals that are used, via Dick Cheney’s Halliburton Loophole, may be polluting groundwater.
  5. Obama supports increased vehicle fuel efficiency that will raise the price of automobiles by $5000.
  6. Obama’s support of renewable energy is anything but ‘clean’. Recently it was discovered that $3.9 billion in taxpayer funded federal gifts through the Energy Department were bestowed on 21 companies backed by firms with connections to Obama staffers.

Meanwhile, the EPA’s stringent regulations may force half of the coal plants in the US to shut down, with no sensible alternatives. The result will be unreliable and intermittent electricity.

Please help us combat censorship: vote for this story on Reddit –  http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/q408q/6_reasons_obamas_clean_energy_policy_is_dirty_and/

US; Police Use Laws To Paint Cold Med Buyers as “Meth Heads” Clean Record Grandma get 1 year prison sentence!

Another example that America has gone completely MAD with Paranoia :

When does a trip to the drugstore become a trip to the slammer?

Apparently anytime…especially in an increasing number of states where law enforcement are tracing and cracking down on users of cold medication.

One Indiana grandmother was arrested and jailed in 2009 for purchasing Zyrtec-D and Mucinex D medicines for her husband – in the same week.

The other grandma in question was recently busted over one box of Sudafed bought at the behest of her scuba instructor for sinus issues underwater. Her nightmare is only beginning. “I keep thinking I’m going to wake up, but I never do,” said Diane Avera.

Commenting on the crackdowns, her husband Keith aptly describes her as an innocent “prisoner of the drug war going on inside America.”

Details about Diane Avera, age 45, while traveling to Florida with her son, his girlfriend, and their sons:

  • Did not get prescription; pharmacist told her to go to Alabama where it’s legal to by Sudafed.
  • Went to Walmart in Demopolis, AL; she, her son, & his girlfriend bought & signed for Sudafed.
  • Sgt. Tim Soronen pulled her over right after and questioned her.
  • Avera told him her intentions; he informed her it was against the law to cross state lines to buy pseudoephedrine – wrong! It’s not legal to bring it back to MS from another state.
  • Truck & purse were searched; son’s methadone for former drug problem was found and his stash of paraphernalia, hidden in truck without mom’s knowledge.
  • Cop accused Avera & son of being drug users: “Thought you don’t do drugs,” he said. “I don’t do drugs,” Avera replied.
  • Soronen offered to call Dept. of Human Resources to “pick up these kids” — referring to her now-crying grandchildren.
  • She begged the officer to not take them away and offered to admit to anything to keep the children with the parents.
  • He coerced Avera to then make confessions that all the Sudafed was hers, which put her over Alabama’s limit, and to add that she was going to make crystal meth.
  • Jailed for intent to make crystal meth – legs & hands handcuffed to chair for 17 hours.
  • Convicted of second-degree intent to manufacture methamphetamine.
  • Opposing District Attorney is claiming she also tampered with drug tests and admitted to using meth with her daughter during the last two years – Avera and her attorney hold that this isn’t true.
  • If she doesn’t win her appeal to the Alabama Court of Appeals she must serve a year in jail.

 

“When common household medications and disinfectants are now illegal to possess, I believe we have gone overboard with the drug laws,” husband Keith said.

As cases like this show, even medications that are legal to possess can ruin people’s lives from just one extrapolated accusation.
Police are also reportedly searching people’s homes and using common household cleaners as grounds for “conspiracy to create drugs.”
The director of Mississippi’s Narcotics Bureau claims the stricter laws have led to a 67% decline in meth labs and subsequent child endangerment. He says that law enforcement doesn’t target people who bring pseudoephedrine back to Mississippi unless they have previous arrests. “The last thing we want to be responsible for is targeting grandma.”
But that’s exactly was is happening in full force. A grandma who doesn’t do drugs, with no previous arrests, tried to go scuba diving and now faces prison time over a box of medicine.
Some Tips:
  • Never allow police to search anything without a warrant.
  • If a legitimate warrant is obtained, have moral support witnessing the search — and record everything.
  • Never admit to anything – plead the 5th if necessary.
  • Talk to an attorney before discussing the situation with authorities.
  • Use the line “It’s against my policy.” Repeat as many times as necessary.
Source:

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20120205/NEWS/202050350/Woman-says-innocent-trip-Ala-spirals-into-meth-charge

Top Social Media Websites Caught Censoring Controversial Content – Facebook, you should be ashamed!

Source: Washington’s Blog

Facebook pays low-wage foreign workers to delete certain content based upon a censorship list. For example, Facebook deletes accounts created by Palestinian resistance groups.

Digg was caught censoring stories which were controversial or too critical of the government. See this andthis.

Now, even social media site Reddit – which helped launch the anti-Sopa Internet blackout and publicize GoDaddy’s slimy Sopa support – is doing the same thing.

As just one example, posts from this website are being censored by Reddit. Specifically, a friend of this site who has submitted stories to Reddit has received the following messages of rejection from a Reddit moderator named davidreiss666:

from davidreiss666 via /r/worldnews/

WashingtonBlog is not something we consider a good source for r/Worldnews.

from davidreiss666 via /r/worldnews/

Please submit that story from an alternate domain. Thank you.

And another moderator named Maxion:

from Maxion via /r/worldnews/

I am sorry but this submission is not appropriate for this subreddit.

There are certainly also more open-minded moderators at Reddit. But a couple of censors can squash discussion on entire topics.

Why Are They Censoring?

Read the rest of this entry »

US – Millions of Pounds of Toxic Poison to Flood Farmland – Compliments of Monsanto & Dow

Source: BlacklistedNews.com

The EPA announced that it has completed the first part of its study on dioxin, after more than 25 years of stonewalling.

Dioxin is the most caustic man-made chemical known.  Dioxin is a general term for hundreds of chemicals that are produced in industrial processes that use chlorine and burning. Disturbingly, it has a half-life of 100+ years when it is leached into soil or embedded in water systems. Dioxin was the most harmful component in Agent Orange (the recipe for Agent Orange is 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T herbicides).

The EPA says that air emissions of dioxin have decreased by 90% since the 1980′s, but dioxin is dangerous at any level.  The study appears to omit any analysis of dioxin transmission in water and land.  The danger is growing because Dow AgroScience has received preliminary USDA approval for its 2,4-D herbicide resistant GMO corn.  This means that dioxin contaminated 2,4-D herbicide will drench US farm land and pollute water supplies if the crops are widely planted.

EPA Dioxin Assessment Report

The EPA’s press release on dioxin’s health effects trumpeted the lie that current exposure rates “don’t pose significant health risks”. But the EPA does admit that there is a cancer risk, although they are not releasing their study on cancer at this time.  Perhaps the delay is due to the fact that 95% of Americans have measurable levels of dioxin in their bodies.

The EPA’s claim that current levels are not a health risk is contradicted by another webpage on the EPA’s own site says that dioxin accumulates over a lifetime, persists for years, is likely to lead to an increased risk of cancer, and that the current exposure levels are “uncomfortably” close to levels that can cause “subtle” non-cancer effects. These so-called subtle effects may include birth defects, reproductive problems and immunosuppression.

There were 500,000 victims of birth defects in Viet Nam that can hardly be considered subtle.  Dioxin is bad at any level especially since it accumulates in the body.

Humans are exposed to dioxin primarily through food sources. The EPA’s press release fails to mention that people who eat animal based foods like meat, dairy and eggs will continually increase their dioxin levels.

Read the rest of this entry »

Foreclosure abuse rampant across U.S: Experts say- This is very sad, Very Sad!

Source: (Reuters) -

A report this week showing rampant foreclosure abuse in San Francisco reflects similar levels of lender fraud and faulty documentation across the United States, say experts and officials who have done studies in other parts of the country. The audit of almost 400 foreclosures in San Francisco found that 84 percent of them appeared to be illegal, according to the study released by the California city on Wednesday.

“The audit in San Francisco is the most detailed and comprehensive that has been done – but it’s likely those numbers are comparable nationally,” Diane Thompson, an attorney at the National Consumer Law Center, told Reuters.

Across the country from California, Jeff Thingpen, register of deeds in Guildford County, North Carolina, examined 6,100 mortgage documents last year, from loan notes to foreclosure paperwork.

Of those documents, created between January 2008 and December 2010, 4,500 showed signature irregularities, a telltale sign of the illegal practice of “robosigning” documents.

Robosigning involves the use of bogus documents to force foreclosures without lenders having to scrutinize all the paperwork involved with mortgages. The practice was at the heart of the foreclosure scandal that led to a $25 billion settlement between the U.S. government and five major banks last week.

The banks have never formally admitted any wrongdoing. A Wells Fargo spokesman said, “We have acknowledged we didn’t always follow our policies in the foreclosure process. We found some areas where there were deficiencies in our process.”

It is expected that the $25 billion settlement will include no admission of wrongdoing by the banks.

Read the rest of this entry »

US government program secretly injected people with plutonium…. How Can They Ever Be Trusted?

Source: io9.com

The horrors of the nuclear age, in terms of exploding reactors and nuclear bombs, are well known. Behind the well-publicized threat of mass death lies a secret history of nuclear projects being used to destroy individuals. In the late 1940s, United States citizens were injected with plutonium without their knowledge.

In early 1945, Ebb Cade, a worker at the Oak Ridge Nuclear Facility, got into a car wreck. He survived, but was bed bound with a broken arm and a broken leg. When doctors interviewed him, they ascertained that the fifty-three-year-old African American man was otherwise perfectly healthy, eating well, drinking well, and had no history of serious illness. And so, having obtained a healthy subject, on April 10th his doctors secretly injected him with 4.7 micrograms of plutonium. Who exactly ordered the injection, and who exactly administered it, has never been determined, with the most likely candidates all contradicting each other.

What is certain is that no one administered the dose for the man’s health. Although radium was still being touted by unscrupulous companies to the masses as a health tonic, enough people had gotten cancer and radiation sickness that any scientists knew that radiation was bad news. Since the beginning of the Manhattan Project, tests had been done to see how plutonium isotopes affected living beings. Animals had been fed and injected with the element, and their subsequent health problems were noted. When a scientist working on separating isotopes of plutonium had gotten a face full of gas, his stomach was pumped, to get out any plutonium he had swallowed, and his face was thoroughly scrubbed.

Over the next five days after the injection, doctors collected any excretions from Cade to see how much plutonium he retained in his body. Other tests were more invasive. His bones weren’t set until April 15th, and before they were set samples were cut out of them to see how much plutonium had moved into the bone tissue. Fifteen of his teeth were pulled and sampled for plutonium as well. Ebb Cade was never informed about the reasons for any of this, but he might have had an idea of what was happening to him. According to one account, one morning a nurse opened his door to find he’d fled during the night. He died in 1953, of heart failure. He was the first person to be injected with plutonium in the United States, but not the last.

 

Read the rest of this entry »

U.S. – Locally-Grown Foods Account for Less than 2% of Total Sales -How Bad Is This?

Source: All Gov.

 Fueled by a flood of influential books and documentary films, the locally grown foods movement has basked in the media spotlight (including a Time magazine cover in 2007) and enjoyed astronomical growth since the turn of the century. In fact, locally grown food sales totaled about $4.8 billion in 2008–yet accounted for only 1.6% of the $300 billion U.S. agricultural products market. About 107,000 farms (5% of the total) were selling locally in many different ways, including direct to consumer marketing, farmers’ markets, farm-to-school programs, community-supported agriculture, community gardens, school gardens, roadside stands and warehouses that being together locally-grown produce.
The “locavore” movement is still growing, as a recent survey of 1,800 professional chefs by the National Restaurant Association found that three of the top four top menu trends for 2012 will be locally sourced meats and seafood, locally grown produce and “hyper-local items.” Even mega retailer Wal-Mart got into the act, announcing in 2010 its intent to sell more locally grown food.

US Lawmaker Wants To Ban Retail Receipts With Toxic Chemical – And Should All The Others!

Source: http://chicago.cbslocal.com

CHICAGO (CBS) — Did you know the retail receipt in your wallet may contain hazardous chemicals?

Now there is a push to ban them in Illinois. CBS 2’s Roseanne Tellez talked with the legislator behind the plan.

Most people have no idea that many receipts contain toxic Bisphenol A, or BPA. Some stores have gotten rid of it voluntarily. But legislation introduced Thursday will require all stores to find an alternative.

State Rep. Karen May (D-Highland Park) introduced a bill that would regulate cash register and banking receipts.

“It’s especially important because it rubs off on your fingers,” May says. “It’s a class of chemicals called endocrine disrupters, and they really do nasty things to our body.”

They’re linked to breast and prostate cancer, infertility, learning disabilities and more.

Scientists say when you get it on your fingers it goes through your skin and into your body. Even hand-washing doesn’t take it all off. And using hand sanitizers can actually makes it worse.

May says it’s also a workplace issue.

“Retail cashiers have up to 30 percent more BPA in their bodies,” she says.

Chains like Whole foods and Costco and even smaller stores like Sunset Foods in Highwood already use environmentally friendly paper.

What can you do right now? Never let children handle receipts. Put your receipts in an envelope if you plan to hang on to them. And make sure you wash your hands. Even though it won’t get it all off, it helps.

Stores that have already phased BPA out include KFC, Taco Bell, McDonalds and by the end of the year drugstore CVS.

US Taxpayers slapped with $32 billion bill to pay for TSA molestation of their children and seniors

(NaturalNews) The Obama Administration has proposed significantly hiking air travel fees to cover the costs associated with the U.S. Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) molestation of air travelers. Under the new plan, which would garner a whopping $32 billion in ten years, ticket fees that cover the costs of TSA security screenings would more than double for passengers, costing them at least $5 per one-way trip.

As the TSA continues installing naked body scanners at U.S. airports and hiring hordes of new agents to grope travelers at airports, bus stations, trains stations, and even sports stadiums, the agency’s more than $8 billion annual budget is rapidly ballooning. And rather than continue to siphon the cash to pay for this unconstitutional nightmare of tyranny directly from taxpayers, Obama and Co. wants to make airlines, airports, and air travelers foot the bill.

According to a recent Reuters report, the administration wants to charge airlines a $100 departure fee for every commercial, business, and other type of jet that takes off from an airport. The plan would also eliminate federal grant funding for medium and large-sized airports to complete construction projects, which means the airports would have to significantly raise fees for travelers and airlines in order to cover these costs.

Read the rest of this entry »

White House, US Courts & EPA Shaft Veterans to Protect Monsanto – Another Croc!

Source: NaturalSociety

American veterans and the entire country of Viet Nam affected by Agent Orange have been shafted beyond imagination due to corruption within the US government and US courts. US courts have protected Monsanto and Dow Chemical from liability and criminal prosecution. The US government has shielded Monsanto and Dow from the massive cost of medical treatment for victims and environmental remediation cleanup costs that would drive these corporations into bankruptcy.

Before we delve further into the issue, it’s important to detail what exactly dioxin is. Dioxin has a half life of 100 years or more when it is below the surface, leached into soil or embedded in river or stream sediment. Dioxin was generated as a byproduct of herbicide 2,4,5-T made by Monsanto and Dow, the top 2 producers of Agent Orange. It causes cancer, birth defects, liver damage and other major health problems.

Monsanto & Dow’s 2,4,5-T dioxin laden-herbicide was used in the US for agricultural purposes in the 1940′s before it was used for chemical warfare in Viet Nam from the early 1960′s through 1971. It was phased out in the late 1970′s. Now, let’s discuss the political situation behind this carcinogen.
US Government and US Court Dioxin Cover-Ups

President Reagans’s administration, in cahoots with the CDC, thwarted a $43 million Congressional Study of Agent Orange in 1987 to protect itself and its corporate pals Monsanto & Dow from accountability to US veterans and the people of Viet Nam.

US Courts dismissed veterans’ Agent Orange lawsuits based on a Supreme Court precedent, known as the Feres Doctrine, freeing the government of responsibility for deaths and injuries related to military service.

The Supreme Court refused to hear American and Vietnamese victims’ lawsuits against Monsanto, Dow and other Agent Orange manufacturers on 3 separate occasions. Remember that the Supreme Court collects their checks from the federal government.

Atrocious Criminal Acts By Monsanto & Dow

Agent Orange makers hide behind government contractor immunity, despite the fact that dioxin contaminated herbicide 2,4,5-T was produced long before they were contractors for the government (50 million tons of the herbicide was sprayed in the US per year). No modifications were used for Monsanto & Dow’s herbicide — half the ingredients in Agent Orange — so the immunity defense falls flat.

 

Read the rest of this entry »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,392 other followers

%d bloggers like this: